| Re: Commentary? Wikistyle?
Agreed. It needs to be like a study. For too long those trying to make their publication unique, for sales reasons, transgress or at minimum present ideas that confuse and introduce ideas that are just plain stretches or false and add to the fire of false teaching. This needs to be purely a study guide along with plenty of cross referencing relative BCV of why and how each verse works within the bounderies of the chapter, book and context.
|