| Christistiosity?
I realize that the common habit of systematically picking out and separating each part/section of a post in order to object to the WHOLE message piece by piece is not undestood as "taking out of context", but it is a tactic used by the god of confusion to keep humanity from realizing objective truth (and it is VERY effective). However, we all have freewill, this habit is the 'status quo' (accepted norm).
I also realize that whenever I say/write anything that is contrary to the status quo, I will be resented by the other person because they use the status quo to validate themselves. Their intention will become 'singular and inflexible' and that they have already decided that they must forever object to and discredit whatever I say/write (at this point, actual "DISCUSSION" is starting to seem impossible).
Yet, all of that is not what really boithers me, it is the ABUSE/ridicule/mockery part ("cookie cutter post" that your puffed up 'master scholar' intellect has imagined). Whether or not you realize that by being a "master intellectual scholar" you are glorifying YOURSELF (not GOD), I don't feel the necessity of accepting abuse from you.
IF you ever do become a 'GODLY' Christian, you will first have to learn to be CIVIL (but civility is not taught in the traditional "christian" teachings of MAN).
"...they refused to love the truth AND SO BE SAVED".
|